Politics
‘Betrayal’: Trump-Supporting State at Risk of ‘Financial Blow’ Amid Key Industry Funding Cuts
By Jake Beardslee · February 18, 2025

Proposed Federal Budget Cuts May Impact Biomedical Research in Missouri
Biomedical researchers in Missouri could face significant setbacks due to proposed cuts to federal funding under former President Donald Trump’s budget reductions. The cuts, totaling $4 billion nationwide, also target the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the country's leading source of biomedical research funding. Andrew Craft / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Washington University Faces Major Funding Loss
One of the institutions most affected by these cuts is Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, which ranks second in the nation for NIH funding. U.S. Rep. Wesley Bell (D-Mo.) emphasized the broader implications of these reductions, calling the university the “heart of our region’s lifesaving research efforts,” as reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.“It’s more than a financial blow; it’s a betrayal of the families who are depending on breakthroughs in cancer treatment, Alzheimer’s research, and other critical health challenges,” Bell stated. “Beyond the immediate damage to our jobs and local economy, these cuts threaten our community’s well-being and jeopardize the futures of so many in the St. Louis region.” LittleT889 / Wikimedia

NIH Funding Supports Major Research at Washington University, but Future Uncertain
In 2024, Washington University received $683 million from the NIH, which funds research on major diseases like cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. While a federal judge temporarily blocked the cuts earlier this month, uncertainty remains over their long-term impact.The reductions target “indirect funds,” which cover essential operational expenses such as lab maintenance, administrative costs, and infrastructure support. NIH defended the policy, stating, “The United States should have the best medical research in the world. It is accordingly vital to ensure that as many funds as possible go towards direct scientific research costs rather than administrative overhead.” National Institutes of Health / Wikimedia

Researchers Discuss Role of Indirect Funding in Scientific Progress
However, researchers argue that indirect funding is crucial for sustaining the conditions necessary for breakthrough discoveries. “It’s a fundamental part of being able to create the conditions to the research,” said Michael Meers, assistant professor of genetics at WashU, in an interview with the Post-Dispatch. He likened the cuts to trying to fly a plane without the resources to build a runway.Experts warn that these cuts will have real-world consequences. “These are real consequences, longer waits for cures and for diagnosis, slower scientific progress, losing out to competitors around the world, and fewer jobs,” said Dr. David J. Skorton, president of the Association of American Medical Colleges, in an interview with The New York Times. Washington University in St. Louis Office of Public Affairs / Wikimedia

NIH Funding Contributes to Local Economy as WashU Responds to Proposed Cuts
Beyond its medical contributions, NIH funding plays a vital economic role. WashU officials highlighted that every $1 million in research funding generates 11 local jobs, reinforcing the university’s role as a major economic driver in the St. Louis region.In response, Washington University leadership is mobilizing efforts to push back against the cuts. “Our leadership team is closely reviewing the policy, and our government relations team is engaging with congressional representatives and others to ensure that they understand the consequences of these cuts and are encouraged to act,” officials stated. NIH / Wikimedia

University of Missouri Anticipates Funding Reductions with Broader Implications
The University of Missouri is also bracing for significant losses. Christopher Ave, the university’s communications director, stressed the broader ramifications, telling the Post-Dispatch: “This change would mean significant annual reductions in funding for our vital NIH-sponsored research that saves lives, creates jobs, enhances national security, and improves quality of life for people in every part of our state and across the nation.”Researchers stress that the issue extends beyond the scientific community. “We need to be clear that this is not a problem for the few of us that are sitting up here in our research labs,” said Meers. “It is a problem for every American, every Missourian, and every St. Louisan; and it’s important that that’s understood.” Lectrician2 / Wikimedia